Learning Styles Questionnaire

Learning Styles Questionnaire

Learning Styles Questionnaire

Directions: The questionnaire will help you discover your learning style preferences. It will help you in 2 ways. First, by clarifying your preferred ways of learning so that you are in a better position to recognise experiences that best suit your style; second, by broadening your scope to strengthen under-utilised styles.


It will take you 10 to 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire. The accuracy of the results depends on how honest you are. There are no right and wrong answers. If you agree more than you disagree with a statement put a tick (✓) in the box. If you disagree more than you agree with a statement put a cross (X) in the box. Make sure you answer each item. 

80- Item Learning Questionnaire

Contact Us

I have strong beliefs about what is right and wrong, good or bad.

I often act without considering the possible consequences.

I tend to solve problems, using a step-by-step approach.  

I believe that formal procedure & policies restrict people.

I have a reputation for saying what I think, simply & directly.

I often find that actions based on feelings are as sound as those based on careful thought & analysis

I like the sort of work where I have time for thorough preparation & implementation

I regularly question people about their basic assumptions.

What matters most is whether something works in practice.

I actively seek out new experiences.

When I hear about a new idea or approach I immediately start working out how to apply it to practice.

I am keen on self discipline such as watching my diet, taking regular exercise, sticking to a fixed routine, etc.

I take pride in doing a thorough job.

I get on best with logical, analytical people & less well with spontaneous “irrational” people.

I take care over the interpretation of data available to me & avoid jumping to conclusions.

I like to reach a decision carefully after weighing up many alternatives.

I am attracted more to novel, unusual ideas than to practical ones.

I don’t like disorganised things & prefer to fit things into a coherent pattern.

I accept & stick to laid down procedures & policies so long as I regard them as an efficient way of getting the job done.

I like to relate my actions to general principle.

In discussions I like to get straight to the point.

I tend to have distant, rather formal relationships with people at work.

I thrive on the challenge of tackling something new & different.

I enjoy fun loving spontaneous people.

I pay meticulous attention to detail before coming to a conclusion.

I find it difficult to produce ideas on impulse.

I believe in coming to the point immediately.

I am careful not to jump to conclusions too quickly.

I accord other the same rights as I accord myself.

Flippant people who don’t take things seriously enough usually irritate me.

I listen to other people’s point of view before I put my own forward.

I tend to be open about how I’m feeling.

In discussions I enjoy the manoeuvrings of the other participants.

I prefer to respond to events on a spontaneous, flexible basis rather than plan things out in advance.

I tend to be attracted by techniques such as network analysis, flow charts, branching programmes, contingency planning etc.

It worries me if I have to rush out a piece of work to meet a tight deadline.

I tend to judge people’s ideas on their principal merits.

Quiet, thoughtful people tend to make me feel uneasy.

I often get irritated by people who want to rush things.

It is more important to enjoy the present moment than to think about the past or future.

I think that decisions based on a thorough analysis of all the information are sounder than those based on intuition.

I tend to be perfectionist.

In discussions I usually produce lots of spontaneous ideas.

In meetings I put forward practical, realistic ideas.

More often than not, rules are there to be broken.

I prefer to stand back from a situation & consider all the perspectives.

I can often see inconsistencies & weaknesses in other people’s arguments.

On balance I talk more than I listen.

I can often see better, more practical ways to get things done.

I think written reports should be short & to the point.

I believe that rational, logical thinking should win the day.

I tend to discuss specific things with people rather than engaging them in social discussion.

I like people who approach things realistically rather than theoretically.

In discussions I get impatient with irrelevancies and digressions. 

If I have to write I tend to produce lots of drafts before settling on the final vision.

I am keen to try things out to see if they work in practice.

I am keen to reach answers via a logical approach.

I enjoy being the one that talks a lot.

In discussions I often find that I am the realist, keeping people to the point & avoiding wild speculations. 

I like to ponder many alternatives before making up my mind.

In discussions with people I often find I am the most dispassionate & objective.

In discussions I’m likely to adopt a “low profile” rather than take the lead & do most of the talking.

I like to be able to relate current actions to a longer term bigger picture.

When things go wrong I am happy to shrug it off & put it down to experience.

I tend to reject wild, spontaneous ideas as being impractical.

It’s best to think carefully before taking action.

On balance I do the listening rather than the talking.

I tend to be tough with people who find it difficult to adopt a logical approach.

Most times I believe that end justifies means. 

I don’t mind hurting people’s feelings so long as the job gets done.

I find the formality of having specific objectives & plans stifling.

I am usually one of the people who put life into a party.

I do whatever is expedient to get the job done.

I quickly get bored with methodical, detailed work.

I am keen on exploring basic assumptions, principals & theories underpinning things & events. 

Enter your free text here

I like meetings to be run on methodical lines, sticking to laid down agenda etc.

I steer clear of subjective or ambiguous topics.

I enjoy the drama & excitement of a crisis situation.

People often find me insensitive to their feelings.

The same thing drives every leader: achieving a shared goal, nevertheless, how they communicate or pursue this shared goal varies. 

In order to build on these layers it’s important to learn what your ‘default leadership’ style is, by taking our leadership assessment we’ll have a baseline to work with, while helping you identify your dominant style.

Leadership is a combination of both style and substance, varying from personal to person with multiple layers.

Share by: